Safety differently sidney dekker boyfriend

There was organisational, regulatory, reputational and political pressure to do so, for sure, and the resources to investigate the instances of harm were too meager to begin with. Making this explicit in briefings or other pre-flight conversations that address the subtleties and choreographies of the present tasks and the people doing them, will help things go right.

Safety differently sidney dekker boyfriend: One of the first

The people who carry out the process create safety — every day Deming, Making it Go Right The difference between things going right and going wrong was not in the absence of negatives, like violations. Statistically significant for this is the inverse correlation between the number of reported incidents and things actually going badly wrong.

The crux behind this is found in the accounting of these mishaps, as presented in the third statement by Dekker. What can you add? Safety Differently "People are the solution, not the problem. To clarify that, if there are more reports on incidents, the company is more likely to have a better safety record i. As you may have seen in the video link above, professor Dekker presents three seemingly simple but profound statements:.

Safety Differently — The Movie - YouTube

But it is a valuable investment of our time since it potentially will help to achieve flow or at least get a few steps closer to attaining that. Broken down barriers between hierarchies and departments As is frequently obvious after an accident has happened, the total intelligence required to foresee bad things was often present in an organisation, but scattered across various units or silos.

Understanding how success is created is just as important, if not more so. A change in approach will entail having to challenge auditors on the way we can achieve compliance by pushing the boundaries of the described standards and challenging the applicability of those old standards to a new context. Husband, father, grandfather.

In between, the huge bulbous middle of the figure, sits the daily creation of success. An insight hit home when I was working with a health authority in Canada a couple of years ago. What can you do to make them even better, more omnipresent, and more resilient? In this special episode of the Pre-Accident Investigation Safety Podcast, hosted by Todd Conklin, we take a moment to honor the legacy of James Reason, a prominent figure in the field of safety and human error study, who passed away on February 5th, Diversity of opinion and the possibility to voice dissent Diversity comes in a variety of ways, but professional diversity — as opposed to gender and racial diversity — is the most important one in this context.

It was actually a large health authority that employs some 25, people. This is where work can be hard, but is still successful. Notify me of new posts by email. As professor Dekker has indicated, the accounting of negative things leads to more regulation. A way to challenge is also to create new standards. Through this talk I first discovered the impact this has on DevOps teams and getting work done.

Pride of workmanship This trait is linked to a willingness and ability to improve without being prodded by audits or inspections. So we then offered to do it for them. Drift towards failure — Embedding Safety Differently without a different approach. Think of safety outcomes as a hypothetical Gaussian, or normal curve, also known as a bell curve.

To get closer to that, a sensible thing I can think of is to reassess the way compliance is achieved. Deference to expertise is generally deemed critical for maintaining safety.